โ–ฎ FUCKDEMALIENS // PURSUE
NASA-UAP-D7, Skylab Techincal Crew Debriefing 1973
? PDF RELEASE 2026-05-08 โŒฅ 2,088 WORDS OCR

NASA-UAP-D7, Skylab Techincal Crew Debriefing 1973

▮ AI SYNOPSIS · Sonnet 4.6

This document is a compilation of excerpts from three NASA Skylab mission technical crew debriefings, dated June 30, 1973 (Skylab 2), October 4, 1973 (Skylab 3), and February 22, 1974 (Skylab 4), prepared by the Johnson Space Center Training Office. The personnel involved include astronauts Joseph Kerwin, Pete Conrad, and Paul Weitz (Skylab 2); Owen Garriott, Jack Lousma, and Alan Bean (Skylab 3); and Gerald Carr, William Pogue, and Edward Gibson (Skylab 4). Reported observations include unexplained light flashes seen with eyes closed during rest periods, a bright reddish object tracked for approximately ten minutes in a near-identical orbit to Skylab with no subsequent identification provided to the crew, and external flashing lights with apparent relative motion observed from Skylab 4.

The document is notable because multiple crews across separate missions independently reported anomalous visual phenomena, and at least the Skylab 3 crews explicitly noted they never received an official identification of the reddish satellite-like object despite requesting one. The Skylab 3 crew logged precise timing data on channel A to allow reconstruction of the sighting. The light flashes reported by Skylab 2 were likely cosmic ray interactions with the retina, a known phenomenon, though the crews themselves were uncertain. The agency field in the release metadata is listed as unknown, and no classification markings are visible, though the documents carried standard FOIA exemption notices at the time of original preparation.

Launched on May 14, 1973, Skylab was the United Statesโ€™ first laboratory in space. From 1973 to 1974, the station was visited by three crews. This document contains excerpts from all three crews to visit the station. In the first excerpt taken from Skylab 1/2 [first crew] Technical Debriefing from June 30, 1973, highlights crew observations of light flashes. The second excerpt taken from Skylab 1/3 Technical Crew Debriefing from October 4, 1973, highlights two observationsโ€”a satellite in similar orbit and another object with a โ€œreddish hue to it.โ€ The final excerpt taken from the Skylab 1/4 Technical Crew Debriefing from February 22, 1974, highlights an observation of flashing lights outside Skylab. โ€ข Skylab 2 crew observation: o Page 23-20. [Science Pilot for Skylab 2, Joesph Kerwin] โ€œWe saw light flashes. I think all of us saw them. I saw them most often when I was in the sack at night with my eyes closed but awake naturally. They tended to wax and wane in frequency.โ€ โ€ข Skylab 3 crew observations: o Page 7-4. [Science Pilot for Skylab 3, Owen Garriott] โ€œWe saw that satellite about a week before splashdown. That was one of the most unusual things that we saw and I guess Jack [Lousma] noticed it looking out the window. This bright reddish object was out there and we tracked it for about 5 or 10 minutes. It was obviously a satellite in a very similar orbit to our own.โ€ o Page 20-1. [Science Pilot for Skylab 3, Owen Garriott] โ€œJack [Lousma] first noticed this rather large red star out the wardroom window. Upon close examination, it was much brighter than Jupiter or any of the other planets. It had a reddish hue to it, even though it was well above the horizon.โ€ โ€ข Skylab 4 crew observation o Page 7-8. [Commander for Skylab 4, Gerald P. Carr] โ€œOne other area of unusual events that we reported on the dump tapes was that on occasion we saw some lights flashing outside with very a definite motion relative to ours. We presumed that they were other pieces of Skylab, or possibly other satellites.โ€
โŒฅ 2,088 words OCR'd

โ” PAGE 1 โ”

BEA/S Gaineser JSC-08053 SKYLAB 1/2 TECHNICAL CREW DEBRIEFING JUNE 30, 1973 PREPARED BY TRAINING OFFICE CREW TRAINING AND SIMULATION DIVISION NOTICE: This document may be exempt from public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). Requests for its release to persons outside the U. S. Government should be handled under the provisions of NASA Policy Directive 1382.2. *** National Aeronautics and Space Administration LYNDON B. JOHNSON SPACE CENTER Houston, Texas

โ” PAGE 2 โ”

KERWIN ( CONT ' D) Unusual or Unexpected Visual Phenomenon. We saw light flashes. I think all of us saw them. I saw them most often when I was in the sack at night with my eyes closed but awake naturally. They tended to wax and wane in frequency. Someone asked me if that was in conjunction with the South Atlantic anomaly. It may have been. I didn't have the pad with me at that time and I don't know. They were numerous at times - two or three per minute. CONRAD Some of them to me were a spot or sunbursts. Some were streaks. The streaks, in my case, were less frequent than the bursts. Most of them were in my peripheral visual field. Very few in the central visual field. I don't know why. QUERY You could isolate them to one eye, couldn't you? No, I couldn't. KERWIN WEITZ I would say mine were primarily in the left eye for some reason. CONRAD You have to concentrate but you can determine they are in one eye. KERWIN did not. they are in one eye. That was foolish of me but I didn't try. I'm sure 23-20

โ” PAGE 3 โ”

CONRAD KERWIN KERWIN WEITZ CONRAD WEITZ CONRAD KERWIN Sometimes I'd be lying there with my eyes half closed, and I'a see a fire sensor wink. And you'd have to be careful that you weren't confusing that with the fire flash. Once you've seen a few of each, there is question of which is which. They're not an hallucination. We didn't feel it was operationally necessary for anybody to know about it right now. I had a couple that I thought were cosmic particles. I saw an entrance streak and an exit streak. Yes, I did too. Where, bing-bing, it seemed like it was one side of the eyeball, and then the other side. One night I remember that there was a long shot then it was blank then there was a long shot in rapid succession, of course, but very definitely in and out - or across the eye. Medical Kits and IMSS. As far as adequate quantity of medica- tion and supplies, I would guess we used about 0.01 percent of the available medication. I think this is something for me to sit down with the doctors and talk about. There is plenty of medicine up there for the Skylab missons. There is 23-21

โ” PAGE 4 โ”

JSC-08478 SKYLAB 1/3 TECHNICAL CREW DEBRIEFING PREPARED BY TRAINING OFFICE CREW TRAINING AND SIMULATION DIVISION NOTICE: This document may be exempt from public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). Requests for its release to persons outside the U.S. Government should be handled under the provisions of NASA Policy Directive 1382.2. * *E National Aeronautics and Space Administration LYNDON B. JOHNSON SPACE CENTER Houston, Texas OCTOBER 4, 1973

โ” PAGE 5 โ”

BEAN LOUSMA GARRIOTT I did too. The sack would move over in the corner. Things we saw out the window. For example, we saw that satellite about a week before splash- down. That was one of the most unusual things that we saw and I guess Jack noticed it looking out the window. This bright reddish object was out there and we tracked it for about 5 or 10 minutes. It was obviously a satellite in a very similar orbit to our own. It was rotating and had a period of almost exactly 10 seconds because you could see the bright- ness vary with that period. We followed it until sunset and it went out of sunlight just about 5 to 7 seconds after we did. It held its position nearly the same, in the wardroom window for that l0-minute interval although we could see it drift in relative positions slightly, maybe 10 to - 20 degrees during the course of that 10-minute interval. It was reddish in color even when we were well above the horizon. As we approached sunset, it turned more reddish, presumably because of the sunlight change. What satellite it was and how it happened to end up in such a similar orbit, no one ever explained to us. And I would like to hear a few words from someone about that satellite. 7-4

โ” PAGE 6 โ”

BEAN LOUSMA BEAN LOUSMA BEAN You bet. We never saw it again. You'd think we would have seen it the next night or it would cycle by another time. Maybe it did and we weren't looking out the window. You might point out that it never did take the shape of an object but it was always brighter than any other star or planet in the night sky. It was much brighter. We tried monitors and everything on it but we could never make it into anything other than a bright light. In doing TOO2, I had on other occasions, at least once or twice, seen other satellites although they appeared as star points of light. Let's talk about caution/warnings at night and in the daytime. I noticed at first when we did have caution/warnings in the daytime we all whistled up there real quick to see what was happening. Then as the mission wore on, we tended to just let whoever was closest take a look. Without the TACS on, there isn't a lot that can go on excspt rapid DELTA-P which sounds different than any of the other caution/warnings, particularly just a caution. I recommend to Jerry and his crew, and I'm sure that this recommendation will be hard to live by, that caution/warnings don't appear to be anything you have to hurry and resolve or stop doing your tasks to race up to the panel 7-5

โ” PAGE 7 โ”

LOUSMA BEAN LOUSMA GARRIOTT LOUSMA GARRIOTT 20.0 VISUAL SIGHTINGS Let's talk about visual sightings. Any comments on countdown. You saw your way to the booster or you didn't see that. Visual sighting no problem there. You might want to talk about the visual sightings on that orbit when Owen and Jack saw the satellite. Yes, let's go through countdown. Any visual sightings on countdown that were significant? We saw the swing arm go away and all that kind of thing. Powered Flight: I watched the booster protector cover go off and lots of flashes and debris and everything in every separation, but that's all norminal. During orbit: - Do you want to talk about that satellite? I saw a couple of satellites that appeared like a satellite would on the Earth. I saw one that was not like one you would see on Earth, so why don't you mention it. Okay, about a week or 10 days before recovery and we were still waiting for information to be supplied to us about the indentification. Jack first noticed this rather large red star out the wardroom window. Upon close examination, it was much brighter than Jupiter or any of the other planets. It had 20-1

โ” PAGE 8 โ”

GARRIOTT (CONT ' D) LOUSMA a reddish hue to it, even though it was well above the horizon. The light from the Sun was not passing close to the Earth's limb at the time. We observed it for about 10 minutes prior to sunset. It was slowly rotating because it had a variation in brightness with a 10-second period. As I was saying, we observed it for about 10 minutes, until we went into darkness, and it also followed us into darkness about 5-seconds later. From the 5- to 10-second delay in it's disappearance we surmised that it was not more than 30 to 50 nautical miles from our location. From it's original position in the wardroom window, it did not move more than 10 or 20 degrees over the 10 minutes or so that we watched it. It's orbit was very close to that of our own. We never saw it on any - earlier or succeeding orbits and we'd be quite interested in having its identification established. It's all debriefed in terms of time on channel A, so the percise timing and location can be picked up from there. Okay, other visual sightings was the one out the wardroom window. That sunrise or sunset which finally led us to the RCS leak in the command module. It disappeared like thousands and thousands of stars out there; all of them different sizes and drifting along the X-axis. The one that we already mentioned. The one right after insertion where we saw the leak in the same manner of the RCS streaming towards 20-2

โ” PAGE 9 โ”

JSC-08809 SKYLAB 1/4 TECHNICAL CREW DEBRIEFING FEBRUARY 22, 1974 PART PREPARED BY TRAINING OFFICE CREW TRAINING AND PROCEDURES DIVISION NOTICE: This document may be exempt from public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). Requests for its release to persons outside the U. S. Government should be handled under the provisions of NASA Policy Directive 1382.2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration LYNDON B. JOHNSON SPACE CENTER Houston, Texas

โ” PAGE 10 โ”

GIE.SON are still on the windows. Just what that material is, I'm not ( CONT'D) sure. But the remaining pieces should be useful for contamina- tion studies. CAER One other item is the ammonia odor in the head which we dis- covered about the last week in the mission. We weren't sure what was causing it. Bill had changed out the charcoal canister. We disconnected the boot between the charcoal canister and the blower above it and took a sniff of that. We smelled, no ammonia there. When we connected the boot back up to the blower, a very strong ammonia odor came from the blower output. Thus it appears that the source of the smell was the blower unit itself and not the charcoal canister. As we said in our report of it to the ground, we decided that it was tolerable for the rest of the mission. Therefore, we didn't get into the mode of finding another blower to put in there. I feel that the odor very definitely increased in intensity during the final week of the mission. CARR One other area of unusual events that we reported on the dump tapes was that on occasion we saw some lights flashing outside with very a definite motion relative to ours. We presumed that they were other pieces of Skylab, or possibly other satellites. We reported our two or three sightings of that kind as soon as they occurred. We have no special comments concerning them, 7-8

โ” PAGE 11 โ”

! CARR but we did find it very interesting to be able to see other ( CONT 'D ) objects up there with us. The fact that one or two of them POGUE GIBSON PO GUE appeared to be tumbling was apparently due to the oscillation of the light flashes that we were getting from them. The OWS Heat Exchangers: There's a major design flaw there in that filters were not installed upstream of the OWS heat exchanger vanes. When we first arrived, the vanes were so uniformly coated with lint that I thought there was some kind of anodized surface on them. I was never fully convinced that I had done the vacumming job properly; therefore, I fabricated a special tool that fit flush against those surface vanes so that I could exert a good vacuum. Though they are not supposed to be con- densive heat exchangers, I sucked quite a bit of condensate water out of them. I tried the best I could to keep those things clean, yet I never did get all that lint pulled out of there. That is why I think we needed a filter in the system. EVA anomalies might also be mentioned here. For example, you had the water leak outside, and I also got a water leak. One thing that was not mentioned on air-to-ground as a possible cause of the problem was the single-point failure that exists in the mechanical way that the PCU composite connector is hooked to the PCU. I was able during EVA, maneuvering through the clothesline ropes, not only to open the lock but also to extend the arm which pulls the PCU composite connector off. 7-9